|
E-Library
Supplementary Readings
Lessons from the U.S.-Canada Free Trade Agreement
David R. Francis
"The
tariff cuts boosted labor productivity (how much output is produced
per hour of work) by a compounded annual rate of 2.1 percent for
the most affected industries and by 0.6 percent for manufacturing
as a whole."
There
is good news and bad news in regard to the Canada-U.S. Free Trade
Agreement (FTA). The good news is that the deal, especially controversial
in Canada, has raised productivity in Canadian industry since it
was implemented on January 1, 1989, benefiting both consumers and
stakeholders in efficient plants. The bad news is that there were
also substantial short-run adjustment costs for workers who lost
their jobs and for stakeholders in plants that were closed because
of new import competition or the opportunity to produce more cheaply
in the south.
"One
cannot understand current debates about freer trade without understanding
this conflict" between the costs and gains that flow from trade
liberalization, notes Daniel Trefler in The Long and Short
of the Canada-US Free Trade Agreement (NBER
Working Paper No. 8293). "This paper," he writes,
"does not provide the silver bullet that makes the case either
for or against free trade." The central tenet of international
economics is that free trade improves economic welfare. "Yet
the fact of the matter is that we have one heck of time communicating
this to the larger public, a public gripped by Free Trade Fatigue."
The FTA, he writes, provides a unique window on the effects of trade
liberalization because it was an unusually clean trade policy exercise,
not bundled into a larger package of national economic measures
or market reforms.
His
paper looks at the impact of the FTA on a large number of performance
indicators in the Canadian manufacturing sector from 1989 to 1996.
In the one-third of industries that experienced the largest tariff
cuts in that period, ranging between 5 and 33 percent and averaging
10 percent, employment shrunk by 15 percent, output fell 11 percent,
and the number of plants declined 8 percent. These industries include
the makers of garments, footwear, upholstered furniture, coffins
and caskets, fur goods, and adhesives. For manufacturing as a whole,
the comparable numbers are 5, 3, and 4 percent, respectively, Trefler
finds. "These numbers capture the large adjustment costs associated
with reallocating resources out of protected, inefficient, low-end
manufacturing," he notes.
Since
1996, manufacturing employment and output have largely rebounded
in Canada. This suggests that some of the lost jobs and output were
reallocated to high-end manufacturing. On the positive side, the
tariff cuts boosted labor productivity (how much output is produced
per hour of work) by a compounded annual rate of 2.1 percent for
the most affected industries and by 0.6 percent for manufacturing
as a whole, Trefler calculates. The tariff cuts raised "total
factor productivity," a measure that takes account of capital
input as well as labor input, by a compounded annual rate of 1 percent
for the most affected industries and by 0.2 percent for manufacturing
as a whole. Trefler figures this is attributable to a mix of plant
turnover (closings, openings, takeovers) and rising technical efficiency
within plants. It is not because of plants being bigger, or a shift
in market share toward firms with already high productivity. In
low-end manufactures, productivity rose sharply.
Surprisingly,
Trefler writes, the tariff cuts raised annual earnings slightly.
Production workers' wages rose by 0.8 percent per year in the most
affected industries and by 0.3 percent per year for manufacturing
as a whole. The tariff cuts did not effect earnings of higher-paid
non-production workers or weekly hours of production workers. Thus,
the FTA reduced inequality in incomes, albeit minimally.
Between
1989 and 1996, U.S. exports to Canada of products of the most affected
industries increased 70 percent. The tariff cuts, reducing the barriers
to goods from the United States, account for three quarters of that
increase. Also, the tariff cuts explain about a third of the increased
share of imports from the United States in total Canadian imports
from all countries, from 85 percent to 90 percent. Trefler concludes,
"Most of the effects of the FTA tariff cuts are smaller than
one would imagine given the heat generated by the debate."
Canadian Economy
With
a population of 30 million and a GDP forecast to exceed $830 billion
in 1997, Canada is one of the world's largest economies. A member
of the G7 group of leading industrial countries, Canada enjoys an
enviable standard of living, an excellent infrastructure, a highly
educated and skilled labour force as well as a well-deserved reputation
as a successful trading nation.
State of the economy
The
Canadian economy is strong. Since 1994, Canada's economic performance
has been characterized by growth, low inflation, stable unit labour
costs, improved cost competitiveness, record exports, and a healthy
level of business investment.
Among
the G-7 countries¡ªthe most developed economies in the world¡ªCanada
ranks highly in per capita purchasing power. The country's level
of exports has never been higher. This is due to improvements in
cost competitiveness and strong productivity growth. As well, Canada
continues to maintain one of the lowest inflation rates in the world.
Looking
ahead, both the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development
and the International Monetary Fund predict that Canada will be
among the fastest-growing industrial economies in both 1997 and
1998.
Domestic economy
Domestic
business confidence is greater today than at any time since 1979.
With a positive economic forecast and good prospects for consumer
spending, overall demand in the Canadian consumer and industrial
markets should continue to be strong.
Canadians
currently spend close to $500 billion each year on consumer goods
and services, with services now accounting for more than half of
Canadian household expenditures. Consumer spending has also risen
rapidly on items related to information technologies.
Average
family income continues to increase and growth in disposable income
continues to pick up as Canada's economy strengthens, labour market
conditions continue to improve, and governments move to trim tax
rates-a process that has already started in some provinces.
Investment climate
Canada's
solid economic fundamentals, strong business investment, increasing
competitiveness, and integration into the North American market
provide the basis for the country's near-and long-term growth potential.
A
sound and innovative domestic financial sector, combined with investment
from foreign sources, provide the capital necessary for more research
and development, technological upgrading, and infrastructure development.
The environment for conducting research and development remains
highly attractive through some of the most generous tax incentives
among all industrial countries. The labour force is highly educated,
skilled and committed, and works for competitive wages. Turnover
and absenteeism rates are low.
Government
policies are creating a more favourable climate for domestic and
foreign investors, including a low-inflation environment. Consumer
prices have risen by less than 2 percent annually since 1991, a
trend that is expected to continue. The fiscal environment has improved
considerably in recent years. The federal government has balanced
its budget and the ratio of debt-to-gross domestic product has started
to decline. Several provincial governments have also balanced their
budgets or moved into a surplus position.
Because
of its economic potential, Canada has continued to attract a large
volume of direct investment from foreign sources. The stock of foreign
direct investment in Canada has been increasing steadily in recent
years indicating continued investor confidence in Canada's long-term
prospects.
Financial services
Canada
has always been known for the sophistication of its financial markets.
One of the main reasons for this is the strength of the financial
services sector.
The
Canadian financial services sector is made up of a variety of institutional
players and markets, all of which provide numerous, and in many
cases, competing products and services to domestic and foreign customers.
It is stable, sophisticated and internationally competitive. The
sector employs over half a million people, or about 3.5 percent
of working Canadians, and contributes about 8 percent of Canada's
gross domestic product.
With
assets in excess of $1 trillion, chartered banks form the heart
of Canada's financial services sector. They have approximately 8,000
branches throughout the country and an active presence in about
60 foreign countries. The country's six largest banks rank among
the top 100 banks worldwide.
Related Websites
www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca
(Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade)
www.statcan.ca/ (Statistics
Canada)
http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/sc
»ò Canadian
Industry Statistics
http://www.fin.gc.ca/purl/econbr-e.html
(quarterly analysis of the economy in brief by the Department of Finance)
References
1.
|
Beyond Quebec: Taking Stock of
Canada, Kenneth McRoberts eds., McGill-Queen's University
Press, Montreal & Kingston, 1995 |
2.
|
The Ever After Effect:
Waking Up from the Boom Years, Linda Nazareth, Winding Stair
Press, 2001 |
3.
|
How Ottawa Spends 2002-2003 -
The Security Aftermath and National Priorities, G. Bruce
Doern eds., Oxford University Press, 2002 |
4.
|
Northern Edge: How Canadians Can
Triumph in the Global Economy, Thomas Paul D'aquino &
David Stewart-Patterson, Stoddart Publishing Co. Ltd., 2001 |
|